While most songwriters or their publishers register each new
song’s copyright with the Library of Congress (LOC), due to the
way copyright law is written, a copyright actually exists
the moment you fix your song in any tangible medium. So by
recording it, writing out a lead sheet, or simply typing out the
lyrics on a word processor and printing them, you have created a
tangible copy and at that moment in time, your song is protected
by copyright.
So why bother to register your new song with the Library of
Congress? Because until such time as it is officially registered
as a new work with the LOC, you have some, but not all of the
various protections that copyright law provides.
The first and most important result of registering your song
with the LOC is that a permanent and unequivocal date of copyright
registration is established. Should your song be used without your
consent, this date will be used by a court of law to affirm that
the use or unauthorized adaptation occurred after you registered
your song. Such unauthorized use is commonly referred to as an
"infringement."
Once your song has been registered, the full weight of
copyright law can be used to protect your song, should it be used
unlawfully. Penalties for using a copyrighted work without
permission can be substantial, running anywhere between $750 and
$30,000 for each infringed work. If a defendant willfully
infringed, that is, he or she knew your song was protected by
copyright, statutory damages can rise to $150,000 per infringed
work.
One more benefit of registering your song is that if you have a
valid LOC registration for your song and the court decides in your
favor, the infringing party will likely have to pay your legal
fees in addition to whatever statutory damages are required.
A copyright owner’s five exclusive rights
Once you have a song that you’ve registered with the LOC, you
have the foundation to exploit your song to earn money. Song
copyright owners enjoy the same five exclusive rights that any
author of a novel, screenplay, painting, poem, or other
intellectual work has. These include the right to exclusively:
1. Reproduce the work
2. Distribute the work
3. Perform the work in public
4. Allow a derivative work to be made
5. Display the work in public (applies mostly to visual media and
artwork)
Anyone making unauthorized copies without a copyright owner’s
permission, distributing unauthorized copies, using a sample
without permission, or allowing performance of the work in public
without proper payment of public performance royalties is in
violation of one or more of these exclusive rights.
In practice, songwriters will often assign their song’s
copyright to a music publisher in order to maximize the revenue
opportunities. It then becomes the job of the publisher to develop
as many licensed uses of your song as possible. Such uses may
include cover versions of your song; placements in TV, film, and
video games; use of your song in a commercial, greeting card, or
on a compilation album. In exchange, the songwriter will normally
share the revenue 50-50 with the publisher. Whenever your song is
performed on radio or TV, it generates a public performance
royalty that the three U.S. Performing Rights Organizations (PROs)
– ASCAP, BMI, SESAC – monitor and then collect a royalty on
the behalf of the songwriter and publisher. Each writer may only
affiliate with one of the PROs.
Song vs. Master copyrights
Prior to 1972, the recording of your song was not protected by
copyright, although the underlying musical ideas, usually
represented by the lyrics and music that made up your song, were
covered. At that time, Congress changed the law to extend
copyright protection to sound recordings. This meant that for
artists signed to one of the major record labels, the sound
recordings they made in the studio usually became the property of
the record label, based on the fact that in almost all cases, the
label bankrolled these master recordings.
Record labels quickly realized these master rights represented
a new stream of royalty income and began to exploit them. When you
hear an original recording of a Motown classic such as "I
Heard It Through the Grapevine" by Marvin Gaye in a motion
picture, Motown/Universal has granted a master license to the
filmmaker, while the songwriter’s publishing company, in this
case Stone Agate/EMI Music Publishing, granted a song license to
use the music in the film. So in this way, a recording of a song
has two copyrights simultaneously existing: one in the underlying
song, a second in the master recording of that song.
For the DIY band that has released its own album, they can
simply send in a copy of their finished album to the LOC and
register both the songs and the master recordings to receive full
protection. Then, if a filmmaker wishing to use their song were to
contact the band, they would be in a position to request a license
fee for both the song use AND the master use, assuming the budget
allowed for such fees. In practice, the filmmaker might have a
limited budget, but remember that if you own your song and your
master recording, you actually hold two distinct copyrights.
Licensing lingo
In the world of music licensing, there are various types of music
licenses, each of which is referred to by one of more common
terms. It makes sense to learn these basic terms so that if you
are speaking with a music publisher or anyone wishing to use one
of your songs or master recordings you are starting from a common
point. Here are four of the more common terms used in music
licensing.
Mechanical License.
This is the permission to use your song to record, manufacture,
and distribute a new sound recording of your song. Even if you are
recording your own song for a record label, under the terms of
your contract, the label will need to secure a mechanical license
before making the records and offering the song as a download.
(Yes, downloads count as a record and as such, the publisher or
songwriter must give advance permission to distribute or sell a
song online.) Mechanicals, as they are frequently referred to, are
audio-only licenses.
Synchronization License. Any use of your song
in support of a visual medium is a synchronization (or synch, for
short) license. When you hear a song used on a TV show or motion
picture, a synch license was secured to pay the publisher for that
use. Depending on the importance of the song in the context of the
film or TV series, such licenses may generate tens of thousands of
dollars shared by the publisher and writer.
Blanket License. Ever wonder if Queen earns a
royalty when you hear "Bohemian Rhapsody" blaring over
the sound system at your local bowling alley on Rock ‘n’ Bowl
night? They do. The three PROs typically secure annual agreements
with any business or venue that features music playback or
performance as part of its operations. The cost for such blanket
licenses varies depending on the size of the venue and typical
audience size. For example, the blanket license fees paid by
Madison Square Garden to use music during a NBA basketball game
will be proportionally higher than your local bowling alley pays.
But both types of venues help add to the songwriter and
publisher’s revenue streams when a song is frequently played.
Master License. This is the license needed to
use a master sound recording in any commercial setting. Record
labels often control most masters performed by top artists as they
invested the money to record them in the first place. However,
more bands are deciding to take the totally independent route,
which will often result in the band retaining the master rights
for their sound recordings. When such a band gains enough
notoriety to attract the interest of a TV or film music
supervisor, they may be in a position to profit from granting a
master license and a song license if they also wrote the song in
question.
Note: This article does not offer a complete explanation of
music copyright and licensing matters. It’s best to get the
advice of an experienced entertainment attorney or music licensing
expert before entering into any binding music license agreement.
Keith
Hatschek teaches music business and directs the Music Management
program at University of the Pacific in Stockton, California. He
is a regular contributor to Echoes and has written two books on
the music industry. www.hatschek.com